Skip to main content

 

DONATE    



JOIN US       RENEW          




We are nonpartisan, not neutral!

Remaining nonpartisan does not mean staying silent. 

Update Member Info at LWVUS Portal         Member Website Help   

News / Articles

LWV Condemns Supreme Court Ruling Dismantling the Bedrock of the Civil Rights Movement

Published on 4/29/2026



On April 27, 2026 the US Supreme Court struck a blow against fair election redistricting. 

Section 2 of theVoting Rights Act states:

. "No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.

The Court ruled that this requirement does not apply to how states draw district lines on voting maps - only to how the voting process is administered.

The national League of Women Voters, along with other groups who filed a 'Friend of the Court' brief in the case. Today they made the following statement:

WASHINGTON, DC - In response to the US Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, League of Women Voters President Dianna Wynn and CEO Celina Stewart issued the following joint statement  regarding this case concerning the constitutionality of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.  



  “In recent months and years, we have watched this Court become less faithful to its constitutional mandate, but today, we have witnessed the final nail in the coffin of its legitimacy. By weakening Section 2 to the point of inoperability, the Court sends a clear message: racial discrimination in redistricting against Black voters and other voters of color is acceptable as long as you don’t say it out loud. This will immediately open the door to racist redistricting; indeed, we have already seen it happening in anticipation of this decision. 

Section 2  was included in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 alongside Section 5  because Congress knew that racial discrimination in voting was nationwide and not limited to the Deep South. Congress has made clear that a Section 2 claim does not require proof of intent to discriminate because racial discrimination in voting can be accomplished through race-neutral means that conceal racist intent.

“The US Supreme Court has consistently upheld Section 2 to challenge racial discrimination in redistricting (most recently in Milligan  in 2023), reassuring voters that despite its systematic dismantling of voting rights protections in ShelbyBrnovich, and others, the protections against discriminatory districting are here to stay. Today, the Court has abandoned its commitments to the Constitution and to the people it exists to serve. 


“Today’s decision will turn back decades of progress toward securing a multiracial democracy, and the League has a message to the people of this country: your vote matters, no matter what the majority of this Court says. Those in power try to silence you because your voice is powerful. But the people have the power to determine the direction of this democracy. And we will not let this decision, or any other that seeks to threaten the will of the American people, be the last word.”  

 

 
 

In its decision, the Court strikes down Louisiana’s congressional map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander under the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. Louisiana’s legislature drew the congressional map with two majority-Black districts in response to a court order in a case brought by Black plaintiffs under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Louisiana now returns to a congressional map with only one majority-Black district in a state with more than one-third Black population. 


The Court then effectively eliminates Section 2 of the 
Voting Rights Act by rewriting the rules of a Section 2 vote-dilution claim to ensure plaintiffs cannot succeed in future cases challenging racial discrimination in redistricting. 


The League of Women Voters filed two amicus briefs in the case. To learn more, visit our case page on the Legal Center.   


The  Friend of the Court (Amicus Curiae) brief was filed jointly on September 5, 2025 by:
 - Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
 - Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC
 - Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (“AALDEF”),
 - League of Women Voters (“LWV” or “the League”)
 - National Women’s Law Center (“NWLC”)
 - National Urban League (“NUL”)
 - Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (“Leadership Conference”) 



Follow Us

Support Us

LWV Cupertino-Sunnyvale (LWVCS)
PO Box 2923
Sunnyvale, CA 94087
Email: info@lwvcs.org


As part of its Privacy Policy, 

the League of Women Voters of Cupertino-Sunnyvale 

does not buy or sell personal information to third parties.