Candidate Forums All Over the Bay Area
Listed below are all the Candidate Forums currently scheduled by all five Leagues in Santa Clara County. Forums are listed by date and candidates are listed alphabetically. Be sure to double click on the link to register for all those you wish to attend. If you register and can’t attend, you will still be sent the link to the recording of the forum. Remember that some of your districts may have changed due to redistricting. You can confirm those that will be on your ballot by accessing VOTE411.org for a copy of your personal ballot.
US Congressional District 16
Candidates: Joby B. Bernstein, Peter Dixon, Rishi Kumar, Sam Liccardo, Evan Low, Julie Lythcott-Haims, Ahmed Mostafa, Peter Ohtaki, Karl Ryan,Joe Simitian, Greg Lin Tanaka
Hosted by: LWV Palo Alto
Date: Saturday, Feb. 3, 2024 at 4:00 p.m.
Register here
SCC: Judge of the Superior Court, Office 5
Candidates: Jay Boyarsky, Nicole M. Ford, Johnene Linda Stebbins
Hosted by: LWV SWSCV
Date: Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2024 at 7:00pm
Register here
CA State Assembly District 23
Candidates: Marc Berman, Lydia Kou, Allan K. Marson, Gus Mattammal
Hosted by: LWV Los Altos/Mountain View
Date: Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2024 at 7:00pm
Register here
US Congressional District 17
Candidates: Anita Chen, Joe Dehn, Ro Khanna, Mario Art Ramirez, Ritesh Tandon
Hosted by: LWV Cup/Sunnyvale
Date: Monday, Feb. 12 at 7:00pm
Register here
CA State Senate District 13
Candidates: Josh Becker, Alexander Glew, Christina Laskowski
Hosted by: LWV SWSCV
Date: Monday, Feb. 12 at 7:00pm
Register here
CA State Assembly District 26
Candidates: Patrick Ahrens, Omar Din, Ashish Garg, Bob Goodwyn
Hosted by: LWV Cupertino/Sunnyvale
Date: Thursday, Feb. 15, 2024 at 7:00pm
Register here
Our Leagues are not hosting a Primary Candidate Forum for CA State Assembly District 28, which covers Los Gatos and Monte Sereno, because there are only two candidates. Thus, current Assemblyperson Gail Pellerin and Candidate Liz Lawler will appear on the November ballot.
PROS and CONS
There is only one state measure on the primary ballot, Prop 1, which actually proposes two items: reallocation of some of the current funds counties receive as part of the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) passed in 2004, and a bond measure to build more facilities for mental health needs and housing for the homeless. You can find much more detailed and unbiased, neutral information in the links below.
- Pros & Cons - The shareable PDF version is available and has excellent information on Prop 1.
- Pros & Cons video - The video explainer is available on YouTube. You can also find the slide deck.
- Easy Voter Guide - Our Easy Voter Guide helps the election make sense. English, Spanish, Chinese, and Vietnamese language versions are currently available at easyvoterguide.org. The Easy Voter Guide also has an excellent analysis of Prop 1.
LWV Cupertino-Sunnyvale Supports LWVC ADVOCACY: VOTE WITH THE LEAGUE
VOTE NO ON PROP 1: Mental Health Care and Addiction Treatment Reform & Bonds to Build Places for Treatment and Supportive Housing.
Although California has a critical need to resource better mental health and addiction services and to address our crisis of homelessness, the League of Women Voters of California opposes Proposition 1 for a number of important reasons. While the additional housing resources offered through Prop 1 are sorely needed, they do not outweigh its flaws.
The bond portion of the measure was rushed through the legislature with last-minute amendments that opened the door to funding involuntary treatment in locked facilities. The rushed nature of these amendments precluded substantive debate and ignored arguments from diverse community-based organizations and health care and civil rights advocates. These groups contend that community-based care is more effective than institutionalization and that incentivizing institutionalization will both lead to worse health outcomes and curtail individual liberties.
Furthermore, Prop 1 does not increase the overall funding for mental health services for counties – the bond money is to build treatment units and supportive housing. Under the changes this measure makes to the Mental Health Services Act, more of the money received by counties must be used for housing of a certain group of patients and for intensive, personalized support services like assistance finding employment and accessing educational opportunities. This reallocation reduces the funds available for other mental health services that counties currently offer to patients, like treatment, crisis response, and outreach. It has the overall effect of reducing counties’ ability to set priorities based on local needs for mental health services.Any variances that may allow counties to spend more or less on specific categories would increase their administrative costs and do not erase the lack of flexibility they would have to meet specific needs.
Finally, budgetary decisions should be made by the legislature, not by earmarking funds through ballot initiatives. Earmarking restricts the counties and the state from redirecting funds to alternative models of care that may arise in the future, or to other emerging and essential needs.
VOTE NO ON PROP 1
Download Vote with the League Flyer
From one of our members, Casilda de Benito - her Spanish translation of our voter info
Below is the result of Google Translate and I confirm it is good translation for the E-blastevent section:
Próximos eventos electorales para su calendario
Supervisor del Condado - Distrito 5 Ene-31 7:00 PM
SCC Juez del Tribunal Superior, Oficina 5 de febrero 6 7:00 PM
Congreso de EE. UU. - Distrito 16 al 3 de febrero 4 6:00 p.m.
Asamblea Estatal - Distrito 23 de febrero al 7 de febrero de 7 a 8:00 p. m.
Congreso de EE. UU. - Distrito 17 de febrero al 12 de 7 a 8:30 p. m.
Asamblea Estatal - Distrito 26 de febrero al 15 de febrero de 7 a 8:30 p. m.
Senado estatal - Distrito 13 de febrero al 12* - Por determinar Zoom
Pros y contras
Sólo hay una medida estatal en la boleta primaria, la Proposición 1, que en realidad propone dos elementos: la reasignación de algunos de los fondos actuales que reciben los condados como parte de la Ley de Servicios de Salud Mental (MHSA) aprobada en 2004, y una medida de bonos para construir más instalaciones para las necesidades de salud mental y viviendas para las personas sin hogar. Puede encontrar información mucho más detallada, imparcial y neutral en los enlaces a continuación.
Pros y contras: la versión en PDF que se puede compartir está disponible y tiene excelente información sobre la Proposición 1.
Vídeo de ventajas y desventajas: el vídeo explicativo está disponible en YouTube. También puede encontrar las diapositivas.
Guía sencilla para el votante: nuestra Guía sencilla para el votante ayuda a que las elecciones tengan sentido. Las versiones en inglés, español, chino y vietnamita están disponibles actualmente en easyvoterguide.org. La Guía Fácil para el Votante también tiene un excelente análisis de la Proposición 1.
Medida C para el Distrito Escolar Primario Sunnyvale
La Medida C permitirá al Distrito Escolar de Sunnyvale crear y mejorar instalaciones esenciales para una educación sobresaliente para todos los estudiantes desde el jardín de infantes de transición hasta las escuelas intermedias galardonadas. El distrito ha demostrado que es un buen administrador del dinero de los contribuyentes, como lo demuestra su alta calificación crediticia y su gestión exitosa de programas de bonos anteriores. La aprobación de la Medida C ayudará a garantizar que Sunnyvale siga teniendo excelentes escuelas que beneficien a toda la comunidad.
Pro-Con próximamente (fin de mes)
Por estas razones, la Junta de la Liga de Mujeres Votantes de Cupertino-Sunnyvale respalda la Medida de Bonos C del Distrito Escolar de Sunnyvale en la boleta electoral del 5 de marzo de 2024.
|